Accessories that indicate kinky interests

[Reidy1]

Anytime I see someone wearing the leather/feaux leather leggings or similar style tights, I can’t help but think they’re a little kinky underneath.

But that also may be a little presumptuous of me.

I don't think I'm alone with this thought it seems.

[wannabetiedup]

Anytime I see someone wearing the leather/feaux leather leggings or similar style tights, I can’t help but think they’re a little kinky underneath.

But that also may be a little presumptuous of me.

I don't think I'm alone with this thought it seems.

Yep, guilty of this too!

[Snidely]

3 or 4 silver bangles on both wrists of a girl is a dead giveaway that she wishes they were really handcuffs. I always put at least 3 'Golf Bangles' on the wrists of my girl to remind her.

[Detective-Gag]

3 or 4 silver bangles on both wrists of a girl is a dead giveaway that she wishes they were really handcuffs. I always put at least 3 'Golf Bangles' on the wrists of my girl to remind her.

Interesting!

That’s a good observation.

Reminds me of…I think there was a signaling methodology involving bandanas in people’s back pockets.

Supposedly, the color & number of bandanas indicated certain interests.

It’s online…I’ll probably look it up later.

[tiedinbluetights]

@Detective-Gag It used to be called the "Hanky" colour code, and is still around, but a word of warning about approaching people that "apparently" use it, so I'll quote below an earlier reply of mine in this same thread. I doubt @Snidely's remark is an open invitation to all horny tops out there in public to approach and solicit "his girl" or any one else wearing similar arrangement of bangles.

Interesting thoughts @Kyle and @wannabetiedup. My understanding of the "hanky" codes I initially referred to was that they were not meant to be automatically taken as a sign of open invitation, only as a 'stealth' possibility. Further observations of demeanour and behaviour would be required by the 'noticing' of the 'noticed' in order to ascertain if the code was indeed intentional or just a fluke. A person 'in the know' would not instantly approach let alone jump to conclusions.

But that does raise the possibility of a some 'jerk' thinking that they know the secret code and to act on it inappropriately. In that case, I'd say that person is clearly not 'in the know' and could easily be brushed off.

By that I mean, if I wore, say a light blue hanky in my right back pocket of my blue jeans, and I was part of a 'club' where that was encoded to mean a bondage sub, and somehow that information got out to a wider audience, and then someone approached me out of the blue and said "ha! ha! you're a bondage sub aren't ya!" to my face, clearly missing out on all the other 'handshaking' layers of the 'club-cant', much in the same vain as thieves' cant in DnD , then I'd simply fain embarrassment and claim I didn't realize, blue is simply my favourite colour, and promptly store the hanky elsewhere.

Basically, what I am trying to get across is that one should not read too much into accessories and definitely not act upon them as they are most definitely not open invitations nor solicitations in public, even if they are intended to indicate kinky interests for those in the know. Any accessory that may indicate such kinky interests is mostly in the eye of the beholder and several other cues need be present to indicate an actual desire to be approached.

[Detective-Gag]

@Detective-Gag It used to be called the "Hanky" colour code, and is still around, but a word of warning about approaching people that "apparently" use it, so I'll quote below an earlier reply of mine in this same thread. I doubt @Snidely's remark is an open invitation to all horny tops out there in public to approach and solicit "his girl" or any one else wearing similar arrangement of bangles.

Interesting thoughts @Kyle and @wannabetiedup. My understanding of the "hanky" codes I initially referred to was that they were not meant to be automatically taken as a sign of open invitation, only as a 'stealth' possibility. Further observations of demeanour and behaviour would be required by the 'noticing' of the 'noticed' in order to ascertain if the code was indeed intentional or just a fluke. A person 'in the know' would not instantly approach let alone jump to conclusions.

But that does raise the possibility of a some 'jerk' thinking that they know the secret code and to act on it inappropriately. In that case, I'd say that person is clearly not 'in the know' and could easily be brushed off.

By that I mean, if I wore, say a light blue hanky in my right back pocket of my blue jeans, and I was part of a 'club' where that was encoded to mean a bondage sub, and somehow that information got out to a wider audience, and then someone approached me out of the blue and said "ha! ha! you're a bondage sub aren't ya!" to my face, clearly missing out on all the other 'handshaking' layers of the 'club-cant', much in the same vain as thieves' cant in DnD , then I'd simply fain embarrassment and claim I didn't realize, blue is simply my favourite colour, and promptly store the hanky elsewhere.

Basically, what I am trying to get across is that one should not read too much into accessories and definitely not act upon them as they are most definitely not open invitations nor solicitations in public, even if they are intended to indicate kinky interests for those in the know. Any accessory that may indicate such kinky interests is mostly in the eye of the beholder and several other cues need be present to indicate an actual desire to be approached.

Ah…you know: I think this initial post is actually where I heard about it. XD

[Redman]

@Detective-Gag here you go. (And anyone else who's interested.)