Page 2 of 2

Re: GINO (M/m)

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2026 1:56 pm
by Xtc
GINO (3)

OK, so Gino was being very compliant but I was starting to believe that I would have been better advised to have gagged him all the while he was pleading, calling me, “Sir”, and assuring me that he would be no trouble, but I thought blindfolding him would render him more helpless and there was no one around to hear him if he did decide to shout for help in any case.

In spite of the whining, I thought I should stick to the plan and lifted him onto a work surface. He sounded quite alarmed by that. “Look, Mush, shut up and put your legs together.” There was at least a short period of silence as I taped his ankles, but it was short-lived until I pulled him away from the wall he was leaning against. I put up with the noise as I taped his legs together just above his knees.

I looked at the roll of tape. There wasn’t much left but I thought there might just be enough to secure my captive’s arms to his torso. Yes, there was! The last of the tape should have made it more difficult for him to free his wrists.

TBC

Re: GINO (M/m)

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2026 4:42 pm
by WhereAmI
Ya knows that it's in the rule book that all, repeat all, Kidnappees must bound, GAGGED and BLINDFOLDED while being transported to the super secret hideaway.

It appears that Gino might be getting special treatment in regards to this rule. :mrgreen: :twisted: :shock: :o

Re: GINO (M/m)

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2026 10:17 pm
by Xtc
It's not a rule it's just that the plan had to be followed for a successful outcome.

Re: GINO (M/m)

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2026 4:38 pm
by DuctTapedBoy22
More please!